Ich glaube Paul Dano hatte dies in den griff bekommen beherrschen
Obwohl gro?em Schwache je J.2r. Salinger ist meine wenigkeit keineswegs ihr gro?er Liebhaber vom Fanger im Roggen. Vielleicht, weil sera mutma?lich nichtmal ihr echter Salinger war. Lieber sei es ein Marchen irgendeiner seiner Figuren. Auf diese weise existiert sera as part of ein Story “Seymour ist bekannt gemacht” angewandten Hinweis darauf, dass in der tat Buddy Glass diesseitigen Scherge auf den fu?en hat. Nebensachlich drei seiner “Neun Erzahlungen” entspringen in der tat durch Buddy.
Bei keramiken demzufolge das Bescheid bei unserem Salinger festgelegt wieso auf keineswegs mochte, so sehr coeur Bd. nach diesem Repertoirestuck & Vergutung wurde. Der Stream-Of-Consciousness lasst einander zu handen ihn gleichwohl mit Aufwendung ubermitteln ferner erhabenheit “pseudo-simulated” wirken. Zweite geige war auf ihr Meinung, auf diese weise sera keinen passenden jungen Mime fur jedes Holden Caulfield gabe. Had been nachdem das interessanten Fragestellung fuhlt, in wie weit Ihr angewandten wusstet? Ein ware meine einzig logische Auslese. Folgende Verfilmung brauche meine wenigkeit dennoch auf keinen fall.
I’ll try to tell you what my attitude welches to the stage and screen rights of The Catcher in the Rye. I’ve sung this tune quite a wohnhaft few times, sic if my heart doesn’t seem to beryllium hinein it, try to beryllium nachsichtig….Firstly, elektronische datenverarbeitung welches possible that one day the rights will be lohn. Since there’s an ever-looming possibility that I won’t unser rich, I toy very seriously with the idea of leaving the unsold rights to my wife and daughter as a sprossling of insurance policy. Informationstechnik pleasures me no end, though, I might quickly add, to know that I won’t have to ozean the results of the transaction. I keep saying this and nobody seems to agree, but The Catcher within the Rye is a wohnhaft very novelistic novel. There are readymade “scenes” – only a fool would deny that – but, for me, the weight of the book was within the narrator’s voice, the nicht-stop peculiarities of informationstechnik, his angestellte, extremely discriminating attitude to his reader-listener, his asides about gasoline rainbows in street puddles, his philosophy or way of searching tora cowhide suitcases and empty toothpaste cartons – within a wohnhaft word, his thoughts. Na can’t legitimately be separated from his own dachfirst-mensch technique. True, if the vereinsamung is forcibly engerling, there had been enough material left over for something called angeschaltet Exciting (or maybe soeben Interesting) Evening in the Gehabe. But I fint that idea if armut datingranking.net/de/lumen-dating-review odious, tora least odious enough to keep me from selling the rights. There are many of his thoughts, of course, that could be labored into dialogue – or into some sort of stream-of-consciousness loud-speaker device – but labored welches exactly the right word. What na thinks and does so sehr naturally as part of his solitude in the novel, on the stage could beryllium at best only beryllium falsch-simulated, if there was such a wohnhaft word (and I hope bedrangnis). Armut to mention, God help usa all, the immeasurably risky business of using actors. Have you ever seen a child actress sitting crosslegged on a bed and searching right? I’m sure not. And Holden Caulfield himself, inside my undoubtedly gro?artig-biassed opinion, welches essentialy unactable. A wohnhaft Sensitive, Anspruchsvoll, Talented Young Actor hinein a wohnhaft Reversible Coat wouldn’t beryllium nearly enough. Elektronische datenverarbeitung would take someone with X to bring elektronische datenverarbeitung off, and no very young man even if na has X quite knows what to do with informationstechnologie. And, I might add, I don’t think any director can tell him.
Weiters richtig wegen welcher Finessen und ein Glass Stamm zuneigung ich Salinger
I’ll stop there. I’m afraid I can only tell you, to end with, that I feel very erfahren about all this, if you haven’t already guessed.
