Results
The actual situation group, consisted of 40 somebody (thirty two ladies, 8 men) with good Body mass index over thirty-five.0 kilogram/meters 2 got an indicate period of ± 8 https://datingranking.net/pl/tgpersonals-recenzja/.47 years. The handle band of consecutive around three Bmi kinds (regular, preobese, and you can over weight) integrated individuals with an indicate age ± 6.34, ± 7.41, and ± six.39 age, respectively. When you look at the case category, 65.0% (n = 26) got a job during the time of the research and also the vast majority was indeed married (letter = 25, 62.5%). The best rate away from a job (77.5%, letter = 31) are one of several typical Body mass index category, the difference between the brand new organizations don’t differ significantly. Your situation and you can control groups don’t differ somewhat in terms of one’s analyzed sociodemographic parameters (Table step one).
The distribution of BMIs of participants in four BMI categories were normal. The mean BMIs of each group were as follows: ± 1.92 kg/m 2 (–), ± 1.27 kg/m 2 (–), ± 2.59 kg/m 2 (30.0–), ± 4.92 kg/m 2 (–). Tobacco and alcohol use and family history were similar among the groups (Table 2), however, those with a BMI >30.0 kg/m 2 (n = 75) had a significantly higher rate (63.5%) of obesity in family history, when compared to the rest (? 2 = , p < 0.01). The morbidly obese group had a significantly higher rate of accompanying chronic medical disorders, namely diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia (25, 20, and 10%, respectively).
Food Dependency Symptomatology
The different BMI groups differed significantly in terms of FA diagnosis by both instruments (Table 3). Food addiction was found to be more prevalent in the two groups with BMI >30 kg/m 2 (morbid obese, n = 40 and obese, n = 35) than in the normal (n = 40) and overweight (n = 40) individuals (p < 0.01), as measured by the YFAS (23.8 vs. 0.0%) and DSM-5 clinical interview (57.5 vs. 12.5%). In terms of severe FA as assessed by the DSM-5 (having six or more symptoms), the obesity and morbid obesity group demonstrates 8.88 times higher prevalence than the normal and overweight groups (33.3 vs. 3.7%).
Desk step three. Dining habits and you can food problems diagnoses and you can symptomatology and impulsivity inside the other Bmi teams, because the analyzed by the YFAS and you may DSM-5 clinical interview, EDEQ, and you can BIS-eleven.
Food addiction diagnosis by both instruments was associated with a higher rate of chronic medical disorders (? 2 = 7.0, p < 0.01) and tobacco and alcohol use (? 2 = 4.20, p = 0.04; ? 2 = 5.41, p = 0.02). Dieting and lifetime number of diet attempts were significantly higher in those with FA ( ± 8.23; median 10) than in those without FA (6.89 ± 7.09; median 4) (z = ?2.03, p = 0.04).
The most frequent attacks just like the reviewed by the DSM-5 then followed scientific interview were (i) use of eating during the large number or higher a longer time than created (71.3%), (ii) persistent desire otherwise ineffective services to reduce off otherwise manage (70.5%), and you will (iii) need (45.1%); every indicating death of control of dining. At exactly the same time, persistent desire otherwise unsuccessful work to reduce down otherwise handle (93.9%), endurance (49.0%), and use even with chronic actual otherwise mental troubles brought about otherwise exacerbated by using it (46.9%) have been the essential frequently came across standards during the YFAS examination.
Food addiction severity, as defined by symptom count in both assessments, showed a significant correlation between YFAS (out of 7 criteria) and DSM-5 (out of 11 criteria). Greater FA severity correlated with increased BMI. Linear regression analysis showed that the severity of FA, measured as the DSM-5 symptom count predicted an increase in BMI [F(step 1.153) = , p < 0.01, R 2 = 0.243]. The BIS-11 total and sub-scale scores did not significantly differ among BMI categories (z = ?1.19, p = 0.24; z = ?1.27, p = 0.21; z = ?0.76, p = 0.45; z = ?0.79, p = 0.43, respectively). Motor and total impulsivity scores showed a positive albeit weak correlation with the severity of FA (assessed by symptom count) but no significant correlation with BMI (Table 4).
