The compact disc always submit the sequence list might also contain table records if dining table features a lot more than 50 pages of text. Discover 37 CFR 1.823(a)(2) and 1.52(e)(1)(iii). The compact disk and duplicate content needs to be described “Copy 1” and “backup 2,” respectively, and an announcement expressing that copies were similar need to be incorporated. If two cds commonly identical, any office uses the disc designated “Copy 1” for additional control (37 CFR 1.52(e)(4)).
See furthermore MPEP A§
821(c) are presented on compact disc, client is still needed to upload another CRF associated with the sequence listing pursuant to 37 CFR 1.821(e) and 37 CFR 1.824. If the CRF can be published on compact disc, applicants will have to submit all in all, three copies associated with sequence listing (one pursuant to 37 CFR 1.821(c), as well as 2 pursuant to 37 CFR 1.821(e)). The compact disk with all the CRF for the series listing could be identical to the cd posted under 37 CFR 1.821(c) in the event that latter compact disk include precisely the firstmet bezoekers sequence list (i.e., no extra content, including tables).
The series list needs to be one document, but the data ongst a couple of music cds using program made to divide a file that is overlarge to fit in one compact disc into multiple concatenated data. In the event that individual breaks up a sequence noting in order that it may be presented on numerous compact discs, the cds need to be identified to point their unique purchase (age.g., “1 of X”, “2 of X”).
If a user wants to submit a digital copy of a sequence detailing book document that surpasses 100 megabytes, the series listing needs to be filed on lightweight disc(s).
Practical for submissions filed on or after , any office ready two new charges to control control of series directories of 300 MB or maybe more in 37 CFR 1.21(o). Rates for this cost are split into two sections with level 1 for document models 300 MB to 800 MB and level 2 for document sizes more than 800 MB. The level of work from the maneuvering of mega-sequence listing try considerable, since the workplace’s systems need added storage and unique maneuvering for records beyond 300 MB. The cost should encourage people to draft their own specifications so that sequence facts that isn’t crucial content is not needed become incorporated a sequence listing. A low number of mega-sequence lists may benefit work in addition to people by reducing the strain on workplace resources, thus facilitating the successful administration from the patent program.
A hundred (100) megabytes may be the proportions limit for series listing text records provided via EFS-Web
The cost under 37 CFR 1.21(o) is born upon the most important submitting of a series listing that exceeds 800 MB, or the earliest distribution of a sequence set of at least 300MB, whichever appropriate charge is higher. As an example, if a loan application had been recorded in advance of (with or without a text file sequence list), and after that a mega-sequence list that’s between 300 and 800 MB is actually submitted, the fee under 37 CFR 1.21(o)(1) arrives. If a job candidate afterwards files a corrected sequence detailing this is certainly in addition between 300 and 800 MB, no extra fee is born. If an additional corrected sequence listing try filed therefore the quality exceeds 800 MB, then the full fee owed under 37 CFR 1.21(o) will be the fee established in 37 CFR 1.21(o)(2). The cost arrives upon submitting for the mega-sequence listing. Subsequent removal or decrease in measurements of a sequence list cannot alter the criteria to cover the mega-sequence detailing submission fee.
