But I do believe that some practise is preferable to no rehearse after all, and flight sim lets me fly into storms, icing, wander off in fog, travel techniques below minimums, bring a motor seize through to myself, etc, all without risking my personal butt or a $200,000 airframe.
I actually do genuinely believe that airline sim can help with some elements of training, in the areas, it is no assistance at all, or in fact damaging.
ProceduresReviewing measures and treatments before-going floating around. For example, for a student, steep turns or stall data recovery can be a little nerve-wracking in the beginning. It may be much simpler (and inexpensive) to get it done in a sim with a teacher, discussing most of the strategies and good reasons for steps. Then when the student becomes floating around, they will not experience the “feel” because of it, but about the general techniques is common.
In the event that sim has good, realistic surface (i favor MegaSceneryEarth), it can be employed for some artistic resource instruction.
Instrument interpretationScanning and cross-checking the 6-pack of tools is possible in a simulator alright, and students can practice doing it for long intervals for a portion of the price of journey times.
On the ground & beyond your planeAnything on the floor, instance taxiing and parking, or something outside the airline, particularly pre-flight evaluation, or weather interpretation, merely does not work properly in a sim.
NavigationTuning and distinguishing VORs, and interpreting the needles is possible as well be performed on the floor such as air
RadiosI haven’t seen any flight sims that basically benefit the practice of mentioning on or playing the radios. (We haven’t put VATSIM, which might assist). I do not think there is any worthwhile replacement for really traveling in a real airspace while at the same time doing real broadcast talks.
FeelEven the number one full-motion sim actually a replacement when it comes down to power a student feels in a proper plane. This is especially valid on ground-reference techniques, takeoffs, and landings, in which I believe sims drop much short of truth. No one is ever going to bring a “feel” for all the airplanes from a simulator.
It would possibly absolutely assist: as I did my device rank my tutor used MS FS 
to walk through (travel through?) various methods before performing them for real. The guy in addition tried it for NDB knowledge considering that the airplane we used did not have ADF. I came across it beneficial, of course, if I’d bought it myself it would most likely need saved me personally a lot of time and cash. An important profit in my situation was actually which lets you run-through treatments to rehearse obtaining all of the methods right and also in ideal purchase; I’ve never ever utilized any circumstances just like the your your discussed therefore I do not know how of use these include.
Another very useful simulator I’ve used could be the Garmin G1000 PC coach
The G1000 features a lot of functions that trying to diagnose them all while resting in an actual planes is tough, even if you possess plane offered and can pay for it. It lets you exercise numerous problems methods, that’s typically tough to do in the real airplane. Garmin provides simulators because of their ‘basic’ aviation GPS units also, and they’re just the thing for the exact same need: you’ll be able to play around just as much as you want. There’s really no doubt within my notice which they assist most significantly.
I think that as glass cockpits become more and a lot more usual, representation can be more and more crucial. They are big tools, nonetheless they also deliver lots of complexity and finding out how to deal with that difficulty properly is a lot easier utilizing a simulator. Of course your eventually need to go upwards, travel, and try completely everything’ve learned for real, but it is no enjoyable attempting to flip through a G1000 consumer guide in-flight.
